top of page
90s theme grid background
Writer's pictureGunashree RS

Flakiness in Testing: Causes, Solutions & Strategies


Introduction: Navigating the Challenge of Flakiness in Testing

Software testing flakiness is a persistent challenge that every developer and tester encounter. Imagine running your test suite, and half of your tests intermittently fail for no apparent reason. Annoying, right? This unpredictability, known as "flakiness," can undermine confidence in your testing system, slow down development, and create confusion within teams.


David Ingraham, a Senior SDET at Matium, recently discussed this very issue in a comprehensive webinar. He explored the causes of test flakiness, how to identify flaky tests, and, most importantly, shared actionable strategies to mitigate them. In this article, we delve into the insights from his session, presenting a complete guide to understanding and handling test flakiness effectively.



Understanding Test Flakiness: Causes and Initial Steps

Before diving into how to handle flaky tests, it’s essential to grasp what flakiness actually is. Test flakiness occurs when a test produces different results without any changes to the code being tested. Essentially, you might see a test that passes one moment and fails the next, despite having the same input and environment. This inconsistency leads to unreliable testing results, which is why it's critical to identify and address the root causes of flakiness.


Flakiness

1. Common Causes of Flakiness in Testing

Understanding the factors that lead to flakiness is the first step toward mitigating it. Below are the common culprits:

  • Tool Misuse: Incorrect usage of testing tools can introduce flakiness. Tools need to be used as intended, following best practices.

  • Environmental Variations: Differences in hardware, software configurations, or network conditions can affect test outcomes.

  • Race Conditions: Concurrency issues occur when multiple processes are executed out of sequence, leading to unpredictable results.

  • Data Dependencies: Tests that depend on specific data conditions are prone to fail if that data isn’t available or changes unexpectedly.

  • Test Independence: Tests that are not isolated and depend on other tests can introduce flakiness.

  • Reliability: Some tests aren’t designed to handle retries gracefully, resulting in failures on subsequent attempts.

  • Unpredictable Application Behavior: Apps that exhibit unstable behavior, such as memory leaks or performance bottlenecks, can lead to flaky test outcomes.

  • External Dependencies: Relying on third-party services or APIs that may experience downtime or latency can introduce flakiness.

Understanding these causes is crucial for taking the next steps in mitigating flakiness.


2. Identifying and Handling Flaky Tests

Finding flaky tests is a priority when building a reliable test suite. Here’s how you can go about it:


Recognizing Flakiness

One method to identify flaky tests is to execute the same tests multiple times locally or through pipelines. Use dot only or wrap tests in a for-each loop to repeat test executions and observe inconsistencies. Incorporating retries in your test pipelines also helps to capture intermittent failures.


Categorizing Flaky Tests

After identifying flaky tests, categorize them based on severity and priority. Analyze historical trends to understand if a specific type of test is more prone to flakiness. This step helps focus efforts on the most impactful issues first.


3. Leveraging Cypress Cloud for Flakiness Management

One effective tool for managing flaky tests is Cypress Cloud. It offers several features to help you address flakiness issues in your test suite:

  • Experimental Retries: Cypress Cloud provides an "experimental retry" feature that allows tests to be re-executed automatically upon failure. This mitigates the impact of transient issues.

  • Test Analytics: By offering detailed analytics and reports on test executions, Cypress Cloud helps you track the frequency and patterns of flaky tests, which is invaluable for troubleshooting.

  • Seamless Integration: It integrates with other tools for notifications and alerts, ensuring your team is always updated about test statuses and potential flakiness.

  • Pass/Fail History: Cypress Cloud maintains a history of test outcomes, aiding in understanding flakiness trends and informing targeted debugging.

Using tools like Cypress Cloud enables teams to stay informed about test flakiness, track its impact, and apply strategies to minimize it.


4. Ensuring Test Reliability Through Independence

Ensuring test independence is key to improving reliability. In Cypress, the before and beforeEach hooks are essential tools for setting up shared environments, allowing each test to run in a self-contained manner.

Additionally, Cypress Cloud's default settings enforce test independence, which can be crucial in maintaining a robust test suite. However, persistent flaky tests should be reevaluated. If a test consistently fails without providing actionable insight, it might be better to remove or rewrite it to avoid slowing down the development pipeline.


5. Data Handling in Tests: Control vs. Randomization

Handling data within tests can significantly affect test stability. Two primary approaches exist:

  • Random Data Generation: This involves using random input values for each test run, which can reveal edge cases but may also introduce flakiness if not managed correctly.

  • Controlled Data State: Here, you use predetermined data states within your test environment. This approach ensures predictability and reduces the chances of flakiness.

Using Cypress custom commands to control data states is often the preferred method. By establishing a predictable data environment, you can ensure consistent test outcomes.


6. Test Optimization Techniques to Combat Flakiness

Beyond handling data and independence, optimizing the overall testing process can further reduce flakiness:

  • Cypress cy.intercept: This command intercepts HTTP requests, allowing you to control the application’s state during testing. By doing so, you eliminate race conditions and synchronize your test steps with API responses.

  • Explicit Waits: Increase timeouts or use explicit waits (cy.wait()) to handle timing issues. This ensures that tests wait for necessary elements to be in place before executing assertions.

  • Run Single Tests: Use the --spec flag to run specific tests. This can help isolate flaky tests and aid in debugging.

By implementing these optimization techniques, you streamline your test process, reducing the likelihood of flaky results.


7. Working with Flaky Tests: Not About Complete Elimination

It’s essential to acknowledge that completely eliminating flakiness is nearly impossible. The goal is to make flaky tests visible, manageable, and separate them from consistently reliable tests. This separation fosters a deeper understanding of your testing environment’s overall stability.


8. Fostering Accountability and Awareness within Teams

A culture of accountability is crucial for maintaining a stable testing environment. Encourage team members to stay informed about software updates, tool changes, and best practices for reducing flakiness. When flaky tests are found, accountability helps drive prompt action to address them, improving the test suite's reliability.



Conclusion: Strategic Flakiness Management for Reliable Testing

In software development, dealing with test flakiness can be one of the most frustrating experiences. However, understanding the underlying causes and implementing targeted strategies can significantly reduce the impact of flaky tests. From leveraging tools like Cypress Cloud for retries and analytics to optimizing your tests through data control and explicit waits, managing flakiness becomes a structured process rather than a guessing game.


The key takeaway from David Ingraham's insights is that handling flakiness requires a strategic blend of awareness, accountability, and the right tools. By promoting a culture that actively addresses flaky tests, you can build a more reliable and efficient testing suite, driving your development pipeline toward greater success.


Key Takeaways:

  • Identify common causes of flakiness to implement effective mitigation strategies.

  • Use Cypress Cloud’s features for retries, analytics, and flakiness tracking.

  • Promote test independence to enhance test reliability.

  • Control data states within tests to maintain consistency.

  • Optimize tests with tools like cy.intercept, explicit waits, and specific test executions.

  • Accept that complete elimination of flakiness isn't feasible; instead, focus on visibility and management.

  • Foster accountability and team awareness to create a proactive approach to testing challenges.




FAQs About Flakiness in Software Testing


Q1: What is test flakiness, and why is it problematic?

A: Test flakiness refers to inconsistencies in test results without any changes to the codebase. It’s problematic because it undermines confidence in testing outcomes, slows down development, and makes it difficult to identify actual issues.


Q2: How can I identify flaky tests in my test suite?

A: Identify flaky tests by executing them multiple times locally or within pipelines. Use retry mechanisms, analyze historical data, and categorize tests based on severity and priority.


Q3: How does Cypress Cloud help in managing flakiness?

A: Cypress Cloud provides features like experimental retries, test analytics, flakiness tracking, and integration with notifications, helping to monitor, identify, and address flaky tests effectively.


Q4: Why is test independence important in reducing flakiness?

A: Test independence ensures that each test runs in a self-contained environment, reducing the chances of one test affecting the outcome of another, which significantly mitigates flakiness.


Q5: What’s the role of data control in reducing flakiness?

A: Controlling data within tests ensures a predictable environment, reducing the variability that leads to flakiness. Using Cypress custom commands to set data states is a recommended approach.


Q6: Is it possible to completely eliminate flaky tests?

A: No, completely eliminating flaky tests is nearly impossible. The focus should be on making flaky tests visible, managing them effectively, and separating them from reliable tests.


Q7: How can I foster accountability within my team to address flakiness?

A: Encourage developers to stay informed about software updates, testing tools, and best practices. Promote a culture where flaky tests are documented, reviewed, and resolved collaboratively.


Q8: Can retry mechanisms always fix flaky tests?

A: Retries can mitigate the impact of transient issues but won't fix the root cause of flakiness. Use them judiciously in conjunction with other strategies like test independence and data control.


Article Sources


Comments


bottom of page